Evaluation of Ontologies and DL Reasoners
نویسندگان
چکیده
Ontology driven architecture has revolutionized the inference system by allowing interoperability and efficient reasoning between heterogeneous multivendors systems. Sound reasoning support is highly important for sound semantic web ontologies which can only be possible if state-of-the-art Description Logic Reasoners were capable enough to identify inconsistency and classify taxonomy in ontologies. We have discussed existing ontological errors and design anomalies, and provided a case study incorporating these errors. We have evaluated consistency, subsumption, and satisfiability of DL reasoners on the case study. Experiment with DL reasoners opens up number of issues that were not incorporated within their followed algorithms. Especially circulatory errors and various types of semantic inconsistency errors that may cause serious side effects need to be detected by DL reasoners for sound reasoning from ontologies. The evaluation of DL reasoners on Automobile ontology helps in updating the subsumption, satisfiability and consistency checking algorithms for OWL ontologies, especially the new constructs of OWL 1.1.
منابع مشابه
Benchmarking DL Reasoners Using Realistic Ontologies
We did a preliminary benchmark on DL reasoners using real world OWL ontologies. First hand experiences on OWL ontologies and reasoning services available to OWL are described and discussed.
متن کاملA Decomposition-Based Approach to Optimizing Conjunctive Query Answering in OWL DL
Scalable query answering over Description Logic (DL) based ontologies plays an important role for the success of the Semantic Web. Towards tackling the scalability problem, we propose a decomposition-based approach to optimizing existing OWL DL reasoners in evaluating conjunctive queries in OWL DL ontologies. The main idea is to decompose a given OWL DL ontology into a set of target ontologies ...
متن کاملThe OWL Reasoner Evaluation Goes Mobile
The advantage of using semantic reasoners based on Description Logics (DL) for the development of intelligent systems is doubtless: They make easy the optimal management of knowledge (expressed as ontologies). Reasoning is a complex and computationally expensive task traditionally performed on powerful server and desktop computers. However, we should not discard reasoners from being used on mob...
متن کاملRuQAR: Reasoning Framework for OWL 2 RL Ontologies
This paper addresses the first release of the Rule-based Query Answering and Reasoning framework (RuQAR). The tool provides the ABox reasoning and query answering with OWL 2 RL ontologies executed by forward chaining rule reasoners. We describe current implementation and an experimental evaluation of RuQAR by performing reasoning on the number of benchmark ontologies. Additionally, we compare o...
متن کاملA Rigorous Characterization of Classification Performance - A Tale of Four Reasoners
A number of ontology reasoners have been developed for reasoning over highly expressive ontology languages such as OWL DL and OWL 2 DL. Such languages have, as a consequence of high expressivity, high worst-case complexity. Therefore, reasoning tasks such as classification sometimes take considerable time on large and complex ontologies. In this paper, we carry out a comprehensive comparative s...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008